Scrapping EEDA. Attacking public campaigns on better foods and the school food campaign because they create a "nanny state". The new government is very keen on attacking the stuff the old one did, which isn't unusual. But they're picking on the wrong stuff.
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-07-01 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-01 09:24 am (UTC)It's like, this parent is hurting their child. Intervening is not nannying, it's protecting.
But of course, getting your health ruined by bad food is not nearly as bad. As long as you can't see any blood or bruises, you can turn a blind eye on it. Just like how mental care is much poorer than care for people with physical disabilities. It's disgusting.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-01 10:00 am (UTC)And I really hate that whole term, nanny state - I mean. A state is MEANT to be able to look after people in situations which they actually can't deal with by themselves. Right? I thought that was some kind of part of the point these days. But apparently this is a terrible idea. I guess people should just pull their socks up! And stop whining! -_-
no subject
Date: 2010-07-01 05:38 pm (UTC)Exactlyyyyyy! I agree with both of you - if anyone objects to their children not being allowed to eat unhealthy food in school, why do they even think think they're fit to take care of children? -_- That's not nannying, it should be the norm!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-02 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-01 10:55 pm (UTC)I will be spending much of next year telling contractors that their jobs have gone, whilst hoping mine isn't.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-02 08:59 am (UTC)=/