Although the world knows that these two TLR fangirls are not sane, let's not further parade our insanity. XD (I spent a long time last night photoshopping this icon together. Had to move my whole hand because it was too close to the body/face and a bit hard to see. XDD)
(I wish I could suggest something... write porn? XD;)
♥ XDDD I did some comparisons last night, looking at my pictures and checking screencaps, and for the first time noticed how /narrow/ Dave is! He must have a pretty small ribcage. >> (Although the way his jacket can magically stay around him and look quite snug rather than fly open slightly and be a bit loose probably helps with the looking-narrow thing.)
(That sounds nice, except I'm so extremely bored that I'd go make tea myself to kill some time! XD)
I wonder how his jacket stays so snugly-shaped. Maybe it's really well-starched. Or maybe it's actually stitched to the clothes underneath.
Rush is pretty skinny too--and he's wearing a lot of fabric over his upper chest, to the point that I can't quite work out how he would have room for enough muscle to *lift* a sword under there. Tsh, skinny teenage boys.
(The kettle is all of a metre away from me, so it wouldn't kill much time for me. I do still go and stand and watch other people make tea, though. :) )
For Dave it's probably his brown-thing-with-crest plus whatever that's covering his stomach. It's probably as tight as a corset. I know I always have problems putting mine on... x_x
Dave is just trying to show a decorously tantalising amount of underwear. Just so appropriate people are reminded that he is wearing it. And that more of it could be shown if necessary.
(It really is very, very lucky that Dave doesn't have breasts after all.)
But if increasing the... prominence involves posing in his underwear wearing white gloves and covering his spherical breasts with said gloved arms, would he do it?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 10:30 am (UTC)That is awesome. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 10:31 am (UTC)XD
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 10:51 am (UTC)(I only managed to get into work about half an hour ago and already it is making me sad and grumpy. Sigh.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:00 am (UTC)(I wish I could suggest something... write porn? XD;)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:05 am (UTC)(I am browsing TV tropes to soothe myself. And being made tea.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:07 am (UTC)(tea from enthusiastic junior again?)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:12 am (UTC)(Yep. It is occasionally convenient to have enthusiastic minions.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:17 am (UTC)(That sounds nice, except I'm so extremely bored that I'd go make tea myself to kill some time! XD)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:33 am (UTC)Rush is pretty skinny too--and he's wearing a lot of fabric over his upper chest, to the point that I can't quite work out how he would have room for enough muscle to *lift* a sword under there. Tsh, skinny teenage boys.
(The kettle is all of a metre away from me, so it wouldn't kill much time for me. I do still go and stand and watch other people make tea, though. :) )
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:42 am (UTC)Ah, you forgot the obvious: Rush wears a corset!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:48 am (UTC)Ah, of course. ...wait, does that also explain Dave?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 11:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:02 pm (UTC)Geez, Dave, going around showing your underwear again...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:08 pm (UTC)Dave is just trying to show a decorously tantalising amount of underwear. Just so appropriate people are reminded that he is wearing it. And that more of it could be shown if necessary.
(It really is very, very lucky that Dave doesn't have breasts after all.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:11 pm (UTC)You mean there are people who think that Dave doesn't wear any underwear? :P
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:34 pm (UTC)....Dave, please continue to not have breasts and do resist the temptation of those ads on DLR.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 12:47 pm (UTC)(I can't imagine what circumstance would. Another calendar for the orphans?)