I really, really want betas like the ones Chrissie has: people who would question why something was written in a particular way rather than just put it down to style. The writer doesn't have to take on any of the comments, of course, but she should seriously think about each comment; sometimes a writer can get so immersed in her own style that she forgets the basic techniques of writing, if you know what I mean.
I also think such betas would be useful for many other writers. Sometimes I read something and I know it's because of the style that things are written the way they are but I also know it could be so much better or just less bad if they had someone look at it and question it.
Not many people can accept having their work beta-ed this way, though. Betas like this are hard to find, but writers who don't have the stick up their ass far enough to just say "ha, it's my style, if you don't like then don't read" are probably even harder to find.
It's the difference between the works that lots of people comment and say it's great, and the works that lots of people comment and say it's great, AND still refer fandom n00bs to it a few years later.
I also think such betas would be useful for many other writers. Sometimes I read something and I know it's because of the style that things are written the way they are but I also know it could be so much better or just less bad if they had someone look at it and question it.
Not many people can accept having their work beta-ed this way, though. Betas like this are hard to find, but writers who don't have the stick up their ass far enough to just say "ha, it's my style, if you don't like then don't read" are probably even harder to find.
It's the difference between the works that lots of people comment and say it's great, and the works that lots of people comment and say it's great, AND still refer fandom n00bs to it a few years later.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 10:52 am (UTC)This, of course, don't work when you have deadlines to adhere to. =/
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:08 am (UTC)i might get back a fic with X wouldn't do this, as the only note
or a whole passage marked up with "written by a muppet perhaps"
the irony is he's usually right
I encourage crit because it allows a lot of growth, I know there are things that we all need to work on (I like loooooong sentences and am working on it) and as a writer we genuinely can't see them, we're up too close, even on a reread because we're automatically back in that place we were when we wrote it
it hurts when i get a story back with a line through it and told to do it again, which i do with pwp lemons if he considers them too formulaic but the difference in feedback when i do do it again is astonishing.
trusting him is easy because I've known him since i was tiny, but trusting him with my writing often still causes explosions with me screaming you don't know what you're talking about, i did that deliberately.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:41 am (UTC)I mean, man, my biggest writing pet peeve is people who say, "Oh, you don't understand my work? It must be beyond you." No, it just doesn't MAKE SENSE. A good beta writer is worth their weight in gold, and I just, absolutely agree with you on this.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 03:32 pm (UTC)That's an overused metaphor. You may want to think of a....
Oh, sorry. Force of habit. :P
It helps living with an English teacher, it really does. Nitpicking sod that she is.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 09:21 pm (UTC)Being a beta for Cat is a total joy, because I love her writing, and I want her to get better and better all the time. Not just because she's my best friend, but having seen the leaps and bounds her writing has made since she started her Creative Writing MA, I feel like I'm seeing the work of someone who could be published one day take form, and tighten, and only get more beautiful every time I read something. I can't understand why anyone wouldn't enjoy being a beta, really. I find it really exciting. *is a dork*
I don't think I could beta for someone who was oversensitive, or a total diva about their writing, though. That would drive me crazy. Cat is a perfect writer to beta for, because she takes criticism objectively, and isn't afraid to tell me if she disagrees, nor is she too proud to say that I might be right, and change something accordingly. All in all, I think we're a good combination *refrains from singing Tenimyu songs* and when you find a beta that just clicks with you, it's great.
I just wish I had time to write fic myself at the moment, instead of essays on 19th Century Literature. :/
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 02:44 pm (UTC)In o-fiction it's the same. You don't need people looking at your work who'll just put what you've written down to style - you need people you trust who are willing to poke it/ spork it and say - uh - you there - safe in your style, question this. Anything that stops the flow of the reading, confuses the reader, or has a chance to sound out of character for your character is wrong.
And it's just as applicable in fan fiction.
It's nice when you can see the improvements you've made :)
I ramble lol *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 08:19 pm (UTC)We should at least get gold stars. :D
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 03:23 am (UTC)I like my style. Sure, it has its faults (I ♥ semicolons, parentheses and em dashes!), but that's how I learned and that's what I like. Too many periods annoy me and make things seem clunky/fragmented to me. Buuuut, if things sound awkward or whatever, I want to know XD But at the same time, I want to know from someone who actually has the "authority", so to speak, to tell me; ie, someone who *is* an excellent writer by my standards and I respect as an author. I think it's only Allison and one other girl (can't remember who ATM) who have actually given me good feedback . . . that is, not simply stylistic things they didn't like, etc. So. Kick my ass for word choice. Kick my ass for sentence fragments. Kick my ass for comma splices and awkward structure. When you're done with that, you can kick my ass for anything else. XD; I'm not going to get butthurt over someone telling me that things need to be fixed or questioning why I wrote something. Yeah, it's a kick in the gut sometimes, but I can handle it. I survived three hard-assed English professors, I can take random internet person. XD
I'm not one of the big-name writers, so to speak. Not many people (that I'm aware of) read my stuff if it's not in an anonymous exchange. I'm fine with that. I'd rather have a handful of well thought out comments to a fic than pages of fangirl spooge because OMG YOU WROTE MY FAVOURITE PAIRING LIKE EVAR11!!11ICHI I think this may have something to do with the fact that I don't usually write pairings anyone but me and 3.5 other people in the fandom likes. :D;
Annnd as a beta, I do tend to only look for mechanical errors/characterization/etc unless asked otherwise. Honestly, I hate much else than that, because well, everyone has their own style and their own voice, and I don't want to beat anyone over the head with what I didn't like. XD Though half the time anyone asks me "Is there anything wrong with this, does it make sense, blahblahblah, etc", there usually isn't XD ...mostly I think I just fail at constructive criticism. :D;; I am totally not the person to go to for that.
But yeah. Sometimes I go back and read things I wrote six months ago, go "..wtf was I thinking?", fix it, then come back a year later and again, go "wtf was I thinking?" XD;
That said, I now go attempt to get some work done on that balls fic so I can force you to beta it.
(Too lazy to write a long reply.)
Date: 2008-02-19 12:19 pm (UTC)