(no subject)
Jan. 6th, 2009 06:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. Characterisation flaw =/= personality flaw. The former is bad, the latter is fine. For example, if a character loses his memory, there will be problem with his personality, how he reacts to people and events because he hasn't got the memory or experience to support him. But it's not okay to be lazy and gloss things over with the "amnesia" excuse. People will still react to things. People always react to things, be the reaction physical or mental. It's fine not to describe the reactions (I'm not a fan of stating everything) as long as you can somehow get the feeling across or successfully tickle the readers' brains into filling it in for you.
2. We see in characters what we want to see. And once we've seen what we wanted to see, then they are no longer the same characters as shown in canon. Everything the characters do take on second meanings whether the creators intended the second meanings or not. After deciding Niou is a certain type of person, the second time I read the manga, he's morphed, if only slightly, into the person I think he is. And so I might rave to other people how awesome he is and think it's totally supported by canon, but those people might look at me and think I'm weird and reading far too much between the lines.
Link from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Hah, programmed the central heating to come on before I come back from work. MUCH BETTER.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 07:06 pm (UTC)*reads essay* ...yeah. that.
unrelated
Date: 2009-01-06 07:14 pm (UTC)Re: unrelated
Date: 2009-01-06 07:19 pm (UTC)Anyway, back to non-unrelated
Date: 2009-01-06 11:19 pm (UTC)And canon characterisation in PoT is really lacking anyway, for characters who are not Seigaku or Hyoutei.
Re: Anyway, back to non-unrelated
Date: 2009-01-07 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 11:44 pm (UTC)(we spent the entire time tearing it apart...)