For those interested: The Iowa thinks yaoi and loli are madevilwrong case is going on trial on 2 December. I wonder if there's a way to keep myself updated on the proceedings...? *pokes around Iowa websites*
It's bad to let kids see nude bodies. Who cares if it's art? Everybody was born with clothes on! And beating people up, the way they do in lots of kiddy comics, is clearly better than nakedness!
Don't forget that in the US version of PoT manga, they edited out Akutsu's smoking but kept the parts where he served rocks at other kids using his tennis racket. BECAUSE CLEARLY BEATING PEOPLE UP IS GOOD AND SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED BUT TEENAGE SMOKING IS V. V. BAD.
It's bad to let kids see nude bodies. Who cares if it's art? Everybody was born with clothes on! And beating people up, the way they do in lots of kiddy comics, is clearly better than nakedness!
Don't forget that in the US version of PoT manga, they edited out Akutsu's smoking but kept the parts where he served rocks at other kids using his tennis racket. BECAUSE CLEARLY BEATING PEOPLE UP IS GOOD AND SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED BUT TEENAGE SMOKING IS V. V. BAD.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 01:09 pm (UTC)I always used to joke about the fact, that if customs should ever take a closer look at the doujins that I buy, they'd probably arrest me...mind you, I said all that in jest and did never believe that would/could actually happen, but here I am proven wrong once again by the American jurisdiction. as a law student I know how silly and stupid some laws and trials are, but that is too much even for me and just...(O_O)
I have to bow in front of the American jurisdiction and its infinite stupidity and dimwittedness! if this poor guy should get convicted we can kiss goodbye all of our basic rights and say hello to "Big Brother" and "1984"...*shakes head*
but also: go Neil Gaiman! ^^
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 01:58 pm (UTC)Hope they throw the case out!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 04:06 pm (UTC)Murder, cannibalism, gore, etc. Sex is bad mmkay. :|
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 04:18 pm (UTC)Which reminds me, here you can legally have sex from age 16, but not watch porn until 18. Does that means 16 year olds should blindfold themselves while doing it? XDDD
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 04:50 pm (UTC)This also reminds me of something I read while reading about Silent Hill. Originally they had monsters that appeared childlike in appearance. They were forced to change them. The ratings board would not approve the monsters until all childlike qualities were stripped from them. The exception was one that remained as a silhouette and couldn't actually do anything.
We're way too fucking crazy when it comes to children. It's disgusting.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 04:05 pm (UTC)No one will ever defeat it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 08:38 pm (UTC)2. The difficult arguments aren't so much about what children might see but about whether paedophilia is being "legitimised" via online distribution of images, artistic and otherwise. Difficult because there is some evidence to suggest this is the case.
The UK Government announced plans during the summer to extend the obscenity laws to include comics/cartoons (and for these purposes, child is defined as 18 and under).
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/28/government_outlaws_pictures/
no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 11:15 pm (UTC)...That is beyond stupid D: